3-1 Give examples A criminal investigative analyst must understand the different goals and limitations of the criminal investigative analysis process and its many different approaches. The clinical approach has a

3-1 Give examples A criminal investigative analyst must understand the different goals and limitations of the criminal investigative analysis process and its many different approaches. The clinical approach has a different goal than the actuarial approach. Both are beneficial but in different ways. It is the role of the criminal investigative analyst to determine the best approach for each case. In this Discussion, you compare the clinical to the actuarial approaches to criminal investigative analysis and determine the limitations and biases of each. Review the Learning Resources concerning approaches in criminal investigative analysis. Explain the goals and limitations of the criminal investigative analysis process. Explain the difference between a clinical and actuarial approach to criminal investigative analysis, providing an example of how and when to use each. Describe some common biases involved in the investigative analysis process. SOME READING material Bartol, C. R. & Bartol, A. M. (2010). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Turvey, B. E. (2012). (4th ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Grading critera Points Range: 27 (54%) – 30 (60%) Discussion posting demonstrates an understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Posting provides significant detail including multiple relevant examples, evidence from the readings and other scholarly sources, and discerning ideas.